Overall Ratio
Uses 12-tooth sums to evaluate full-arch size discrepancy.
ZenaraMed Clinical Toolkit
Calculate overall and anterior tooth-size discrepancy in seconds using a clean, worksheet-style workflow.
Bolton analysis helps estimate maxillary or mandibular tooth-size excess. This page gives a practical flow for quick calculations and communication.
Uses 12-tooth sums to evaluate full-arch size discrepancy.
Uses the middle 6 anterior teeth for smile-zone proportional analysis.
Shows ideal counterpart values and absolute differences in millimeters.
A mathematical standard that remains the cornerstone of modern orthodontic diagnosis.
In his seminal 1958 research, "Disharmony in tooth size and its relation to the analysis and treatment of malocclusion," Wayne A. Bolton conducted a meticulous analysis of 55 cases with exceptional, untreated occlusion. By measuring the mesiodistal widths of the permanent dentition, he identified two constant mathematical relationships required for optimal intercuspation:
Bolton’s 1962 follow-up study bridged the gap between academic research and clinical chairside practice. He demonstrated that a significant Tooth-Size Discrepancy (TSD)—exceeding one or two standard deviations—precludes the achievement of a stable Class I relationship. Whether managing maxillary lateral incisor microdontia (peg laterals) or mandibular dental excess, the Bolton analysis provides the objective roadmap for deciding between interproximal reduction (IPR), extractions, or restorative build-ups.
Filled: 0 / 24
Enter right-to-left values for each arch. Anterior sum uses the middle 6 teeth in each row.
| Arch | 6R | 5R | 4R | 3R | 2R | 1R | 1L | 2L | 3L | 4L | 5L | 6L |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maxillary | ||||||||||||
| Mandibular |
Use this questionnaire to determine if the discrepancy is due to tooth-size excess or arch-size deficiency.
1. Are any teeth abnormally small (e.g., Peg Laterals)?
2. Are any teeth missing or impacted?
3. Where is the unexplained spacing/crowding?
4. Desired treatment approach?
Data source: "Descriptive Anatomy of the Human Teeth" (G.V. Black, 1902). Based on a comprehensive study of North American Caucasian populations to establish normative dental dimensions.
| Tooth | Max (mm) | Mand (mm) |
|---|---|---|
| Central (1) | 8.5 | 5.0 |
| Lateral (2) | 6.5 | 5.5 |
| Canine (3) | 7.5 | 7.0 |
| 1st Premolar (4) | 7.0 | 7.0 |
| 2nd Premolar (5) | 7.0 | 7.0 |
| 1st Molar (6) | 10.5 | 11.0 |
Note: Modern studies (e.g., Moyers, 1988) show slight variations across diverse ethnic groups. Use as a clinical baseline.
View Original Text (1902)Complete the analysis and questionnaire for a clinical conclusion.
Enter all values to generate clinical summary.
-- %
Enter values to calculate.
Actual Mand 12
-- mm
Ideal Mand 12
-- mm
Diff
-- mm
Actual Max 12
-- mm
Ideal Max 12
-- mm
Diff
-- mm
-- %
Enter values to calculate.
Actual Mand 6
-- mm
Ideal Mand 6
-- mm
Diff
-- mm
Actual Max 6
-- mm
Ideal Max 6
-- mm
Diff
-- mm
Reference means: Overall 91.3%, Anterior 77.2%.
Analysis based on the pioneering work of Wayne A. Bolton.
Bolton, W. A. (1958). Disharmony in tooth size and its relation to the analysis and treatment of malocclusion. The Angle Orthodontist, 28(3), 113–130.
Read Original Article (1958)Bolton, W. A. (1962). The clinical application of a tooth-size analysis. American Journal of Orthodontics, 48(7), 504–529.
Read Original Article (1962)Acknowledgment: We credit the mathematical foundations of this tool to the late Wayne A. Bolton, whose research defined the standard ratios for diagnosing tooth-size discrepancies in orthodontics.
The same practical, fast workflow style used across ZenaraMed tools.
"This makes Bolton chairside discussion straightforward for patients and team."
"The ideal vs actual output is exactly what I need during treatment planning."